Your prototype validated the technology. Leadership approved the budget. Engineering delivered. So why are you 6 months behind schedule watching the market window close?
"The demo was flawless. Production keeps slipping. What happened?"
Your FPGA team built exactly what was promised. The prototype works. The technology is proven.
But now you're stuck in the commercialization phase—and discovering it was never actually planned:
The real problem:
FPGA programs don't fail because the technology doesn't work. They fail because nobody designed the path from "it works in the lab" to "it ships at scale."
You've probably already tried one of these
FPGA Vendor
PCB Vendor
CM Vendor
Managing Chaos
= Integration risk, finger-pointing, timeline slippage
Xlera Solutions
End-to-end ownership:
FPGA + PCB + Firmware + Manufacturing
Focus on Business
One partner, one outcome, on time
= Single accountability, clear timeline, production revenue
One partner who owns the entire path from working prototype to production revenue.
Not five vendors. One accountable outcome.
It's not the technology. It's the invisible handoffs nobody planned for.
Most FPGA programs fail in the space between:
Your prototype works with hand-picked components.
Production fails when lead times spike or parts go EOL mid-program.
Your demo passed every test.
Production units fail intermittently because verification wasn't designed for manufacturing variability.
Your team designed it. The CM can't build it.
Nobody documented the 47 undocumented decisions that made the prototype work.
It works perfectly in the lab.
It fails FCC compliance. You're six months behind scrambling to redesign.
These gaps don't show up in your project plan.
They show up when you're supposed to be shipping and you're not.
One partner. One outcome. Zero gaps between prototype and revenue.
When you work with Xlera, you get the complete commercialization path—not fragmented pieces you have to integrate yourself:
Designed for production from day one, not "we'll figure that out later"
FPGA design, embedded software, high-speed PCB, mechanical integration, manufacturing planning—coordinated, not fragmented
Not "it works in the demo." Systems that ship at scale without field failures.
DFM, supplier coordination, CM relationships, and regulatory pathways designed into the timeline, not bolted on later
You don't manage five vendors hoping they coordinate. We own the path from prototype to production revenue.
Defined scope, defined deliverables, defined timeline. No surprises six months in.
The difference:
We've seen how FPGA programs fail. So we design to prevent it.
From "It Works" to "We're Shipping" in Record Time
High-performance networking company had a validated FPGA prototype solving a critical latency problem. Market window: 9 months. Internal team couldn't scale from prototype to production. Three vendor partnerships created more integration problems than they solved.
Hired separate vendors for PCB design, firmware development, and manufacturing. Six months in, they had three working pieces that wouldn't integrate. Timeline slipping. Engineering team playing referee between vendors instead of solving technical problems.
Single partner owning full integration from FPGA to enclosure. Production-ready design from day one. DFM and regulatory compliance designed in, not discovered late. Manufacturing partner engaged early, not after design lock.
Commercialization Assessment: Find out where your program will likely stall before it happens
Most companies don't see the commercialization gaps until they're six months behind schedule.
Xlera's Commercialization Assessment identifies:
Where your current path will likely stall (and why)
Which handoff gaps carry the most timeline risk
What a realistic path to production actually looks like
No pitch. No pressure. Just clarity on what it actually takes to go from working prototype to production revenue.